Examining the Efficacy of Compensation Blueprints for Livestock, Human, and Crop Losses in Zimbabwe’s Human-wildlife Conflict Hotspots

Human-Wildlife Conflict (HWC) persists as a debilitating scourge in Zimbabwe, exacting a devastating toll on human life, livestock, and agricultural productivity. Despite the availability of indemnification schemes aimed at alleviating the consequences of HWC, their effectiveness remains shrouded in uncertainty. This comprehensive analysis scrutinizes the adequacy and impact of indemnification programs addressing human, livestock, and crop losses in Zimbabwe’s most vulnerable areas. Using a qualitative approach with interviews as data instrument, the study evaluates the effectiveness of compensation schemes in reducing conflict and supporting affected communities. The results analyzed through thematic content show that while compensation schemes provide some relief to affected communities, they are often inadequate, lack robust data systems, delayed payments, lack of fair valuation of losses, and inequitable. The study identifies key challenges, including limited funding, bureaucratic inefficiencies, lack of any laid down legislation that seeks to protect victims of HWC, and lack of community engagement. To enhance the efficacy of compensation schemes, the study recommends increasing funding avenues, streamlining administrative processes, and ensuring community active participation in scheme design and implementation. The study strongly recommended establishment of National Insurance Fund (NIF) and legislative framework from both government and other partner organizations so that communities vulnerable to HWC will be in a position to legally file their cases in the event of any loss related to HWC. The findings of this study underpin the development of evidence-based compensation strategies, effectively alleviating HWC-related losses and cultivating a culture of symbiotic coexistence between humans and wildlife.